Surgical evolution in spinal dural arteriovenous fistula treatment-a 7 years monocentric experience.

Accounting for 70% of all spinal vascular malformations, spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas (SDAVF) are the most common type of malformation. Interruption of the fistulous arterialized vein point is the goal of surgical treatment. The aim of the study was to compare open surgery (laminectomy) versus minimal invasive surgery (MIS) in SDAVF treatment. Between March 2013 and March 2020, we retrospectively collected 21 consecutive adult patients with SDAVF. Since March 2017, MIS has been routinely used for surgical treatment. Pre- and post-operative clinical evaluations used Aminoff-Logue score (ALS). Complication rate was noted. Post-operative occlusion of the malformation was confirmed by digital subtraction angiography (DSA) in all patients. MIS was compared to open surgery in terms of efficacy and complications with statistical evaluation. Standard laminectomy was performed in 12 patients and MIS technique in 9 patients. No difference was noted on pre-operative parameters. ALS and MRI signs of myelopathy were improved in all cases except for 1 patient in each group. All SDAVFs were excluded based on post-operative DSA. Significant differences were noted between the 2 groups in terms of perioperative blood loss (p<0.001), post-operative pain visual analog scale values (p<0.001), and first time out of bed (p<0.001). Wrong level surgery occurred in one patient in each group; patients were re-operated using the same technique. No infection or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak was noted. In our experience, MIS is a safe alternative to open laminectomy for SDAVF treatment. MIS contributes to patient comfort and minimizes blood loss without increasing complication rate.

An unusual ectopic thyroid tissue location & review of literature.

Ectopic thyroid is well-known pathology for several decades. Many locations have been described. Nowadays, only three cases of skull base location have been described in literature. In our case, we reported a single case of a 39-year-old male presenting with a supra-sellar and suprachiasmatic location. He presented no clinical symptoms, no endocrine alteration on biology and no skull base invasion which make this case unique compared to actual literature. Such diagnosis should always be an exclusion diagnosis as secondary neoplastic should be first ruled out.

Progestin-related WHO grade II meningiomas behavior-a single-institution comparative case series.

WHO grade II progestin-related meningiomas have been reported in recent series but we found no previous study describing their long-term outcome. Our study aimed to evaluate patients operated on for high-grade intracranial meningioma and who underwent long-term exposure to high dose of cyproterone acetate, nomegestrol acetate, and chlormadinone acetate. Our study retrospectively included 9 patients with high-grade progestin-related intracranial meningioma between December 2006 and September 2021. In each patient, clinico-radiological follow-up was performed every 6 months after diagnosis and treatment withdrawal recommendation. The mean progestative exposure was 11.4 years. Edema existence or absence of cleft sign on MRI were the key factors for surgical indication. All patients underwent surgery. Adjuvant radiotherapy was indicated in 1 patient, and Gamma Knife radiosurgery was proposed in 2 other patients for a second location of meningioma. Six patients harbored a grade II chordoid meningioma subtype with 100% PR expression and 3 patients a grade II atypical meningioma subtype with lower PR expression. The mean follow-up was 8.1 years and none of the 9 patients presented with a recurrence. Patients with grade II progestin-related meningiomas have less tumor recurrence after surgery than patients with sporadic grade II meningiomas, especially after progestin withdrawal. The presence/appearance of peri-meningioma edema and the absence of cleft sign before volumetric change should suggest the existence of an underlying WHO grade II meningiomas. In these cases, surgical resection may immediately be considered and adjuvant radiotherapy should be reserved for proven recurrence cases.

Preliminary report of patients with meningiomas exposed to Cyproterone Acetate, Nomegestrol Acetate and Chlormadinone Acetate - Monocentric ongoing study on progestin related meningiomas.

INTRODUCTION: The relationship between meningioma and progestins has not been elucidated. Meningioma regression after acetate cyproterone (CA) withdrawal has been reported. Our purpose was to evaluate the meningioma evolution after withdrawal of progestins in patients who underwent long-term exposure to CA, nomegestrol acetate (NA), chlormadinone acetate (ChlA). METHODS: Our study retrospectively included 69 patients with intracranial meningioma and exposed to one of these 3 progestins between December 2006 and March 2019. In each patient, clinico-radiological (MRI) follow-up was performed every 6 months after diagnosis and treatment withdrawal recommendation. Statistical analyses were applied to compare tumor location and respect of prescription rules between the 3 groups. RESULTS: The mean hormonal exposure was 16 years in CA group (n = 46), 16 years in NA group (n = 12) and 9.7 years in ChlA group (n = 11). A higher rate of "out of label" use was observed in the CA group (p = 0.003). Multiple meningiomas were demonstrated in more than 60% of cases in each group. Anterior skull base location was noted in 60.5% of cases in CA group, 25% of cases in NA group and 36.7% of cases in ChlA group (p = 0.05). Incomplete tumor regression was recorded in 11 cases of CA group and in 2 cases of ChlA group. CONCLUSION: In CA group, our results suggest a strong relationship between this treatment and development of intracranial meningioma. In presence of voluminous asymptomatic meningioma, treatment can be delayed due to the potential regression after withdrawal. On the contrary in NA and ChlA groups, further studies are needed.

Ruptured blood blister like aneurysm: does the best therapeutic option really exist?

Our study aimed to evaluate the outcome of patients with ruptured blood-blister like aneurysm (BBLA) in our institution by comparing microsurgical selective treatment to endovascular treatment using flow-diverter stent (FD). Our study included 18 consecutive patients treated for BBLA between 2004 and 2020. Until 2014, microsurgery was preferred in all patients with BBLA (n = 10). Significant postoperative morbi-mortality was recorded at this time and led us to change therapeutic strategy and to favor FD as first-line treatment in all patients (n = 8). Postprocedural complications and BBLA occlusion were recorded. High WFNS score (> 2) was noted in 6 patients of microsurgical group and in 2 of endovascular group. In microsurgical group, ischemic lesions were noted in 6 patients and led to death in 3 patients. Immediate BBLA occlusion was obtained in all patients. Favorable outcome after 3 months (mRS < 3) was recorded in 4 of the 7 survivors. In endovascular group, ischemic lesions were noted in 4 patients. One patient died from early postprocedural BBLA rebleeding. Scarpa hematoma was noted in 3 patients with surgical evacuation in 1. Persistent BBLA at 3 months was recorded in 4 patients without rebleeding, but further FD was required in 1 with growing BBLA. Favorable outcome was noted in 6 of the 7 survivors. Although, rate of morbi-mortality appear lower in patients treated with FD, neurological presentation was better and BBLA diagnosis remains questionable in this group. Moreover, persistent BBLA imaging with potential risk of rebleeding after FD deserves to be discussed.

Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on patients with intracranial aneurysm rupture.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: The present study aimed at evaluating the impact on the early outcome of patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms. METHODS: Our study prospectively included 26 consecutive patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysm managed at our institution in context of COVID-19 pandemic between March 1st, 2020 and April, 26th, 2020 (2020 group). A group control included other 28 consecutive patients managed at the same institution for the same disease in 2019, during the same time frame (2019 group). On admission, poor neurological status was defined as WFNS score >3. Severe radiological status was defined by the presence of intracerebral hematoma, or/and acute hydrocephalus requiring further EVD or/and the presence of vasospasm on presentation. Statistical analysis was performed to compare the 2 distinct groups. RESULTS: Rates of poor neurological presentation and severe radiological presentation on hospital admission were higher in the 2020 group (p = 0.01 and p = 0.02, respectively). The delayed hospital admission was 2.7 days in 2020 group and 0.75 days in 2019 group (p = 0.005). Therefore, vasospasm's rate on presentation was also higher in the 2020 group (p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this is one of the first studies demonstrating influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on patients with urgent and severe intracranial aneurysmal disease. In case of recurrent COVID-19 pandemic, educating the population concerning specific symptoms such as sudden headache, neurological deficit or even sudden chest pain should be emphasized.